Well then, onward!
Today I wish to discuss capital punishment, a topic I've thought a lot about this semester as I've had a class entitled "Perspectives on the Death Penalty."
The current perspective we are exploring is that of the murder victim's family member who opposes the death penalty. I just finished a paper last night on one of the stories I read in Rachel King's Don't Kill in Our Names: Families of Murder Victims Speak Our Against the Death Penalty. I wrote about Marietta Jaeger and her reaction to the kidnapping and murder of her 7 year old daughter and the need for healing brought about by that situation. (I was going to summarize, but thought, "perhaps I'll just post my paper, it's not all that long") Here we are:
When Marietta Jaeger’s seven year old daughter Susie was kidnapped and murdered,
After feeling this “intense rage” (14),
Once she had made this realization, her resolve was strengthened by something she’d had inside of her all along. “I had a well-developed conscience and a strong religious faith, which called me to forgive” (14). She made a conscious effort to let go of her anger, praying for the kidnapper and trying to feel for him as a fellow human. Slowly, she was more capable of thinking of him this way, instead of merely as the person who had taken her child.
I found it interesting that the desire for vengeance and seeking the death penalty seem to be linked. Killing the perpetrator of even the most horrific crime is simply not an option to one who has learned to forgive. That is not to say that the family member of the victim who has forgiven does not want the killer punished. In the process of forgiveness, one realizes that punishing by continuing the violence that warranted the punishment in the first place is not a productive solution. Rather, the family member of the victim understands the grief, pain, and anguish caused by the initial crime and does not will the survival of these negative forces, but wants to heal. Neither does the family member wish to inflict the same suffering he or she has felt on the family of the killer (who is no longer thought of as “killer” but as a person who has done something terrible and is also in need of healing).
A common way to heal found in most of the stories in King’s book is by building a relationship between members of the families of the victim and the perpetrator. This relationship building helps to erase the division caused by the crime and to create unity and understanding. It also emphasizes and allows each party to see the humanity of the other and to feel a sense of commonality with them. This relationship helps not only the family of the victim, but everyone involved, including the perpetrator and his or her family.
Reflecting upon the healing that happens when one forgives and treats others with the respect that their human dignity demands, it seems to me that those family members of victims who advocate the death penalty are seriously missing out. Holding onto anger is bad for people. This is such a simple statement, but its consequences are so profound. Holding a grudge will end badly, letting go of anger and striving to forgive leads to healing.
